Sensitivity and room size decide it, not the number on the box.
The watt is the wrong unit of conversation
Ask in any forum how much power you need and someone will say 100 watts minimum, someone else will say 10 is plenty, and both will be confident. They're both answering a different question. The number that determines whether your amplifier is adequate is not watts out of the amplifier — it is decibels of sensitivity into your speaker.
Speaker sensitivity is measured in dB SPL at one metre with one watt of input. A speaker rated at 90 dB/W/m is meaningfully easier to drive than one at 84 dB/W/m. The difference looks small — six points — but every 3 dB step requires double the power to achieve it. That 6 dB gap means the 84 dB speaker needs four times the amplifier power to reach the same volume. At 88 dB and below, sensitivity becomes the dominant variable in the whole power equation; chasing more watts while ignoring sensitivity is solving the wrong problem.
Room size comes in immediately after. Doubling the distance from speaker to listening seat costs about 6 dB — the inverse-square law at work in a real room. A nearfield desktop system needs a fraction of the power that a live room demands from the same speakers. A fairly sensitive standmount in a small bedroom can sound authoritative from a 15-watt amplifier; that same 15 watts will run out of headroom in a large open-plan living room where the listener is four or five metres back.
Doubling the distance from speaker to listening seat costs about 6 dB — the inverse-square law at work in a real room.
From maths to practice
A rough working principle: for a speaker of average sensitivity (around 87–88 dB) in a typical domestic room (say, 15–25 square metres), 40–80 watts per channel is a comfortable working range — enough headroom for dynamic peaks without continuous operation near the amplifier's ceiling. But the moment you push sensitivity up toward 95 dB — horn-loaded designs, some high-efficiency standmounts — a well-built 10-watt integrated can be genuinely surplus to requirements. The moment sensitivity dips below 84 dB with a nominally 4-ohm load, even 100 watts starts to feel honest rather than generous.
Impedance is the other variable people underestimate. An 8-ohm load allows most amplifiers to deliver their rated power comfortably. A 4-ohm load demands twice the current, and many amplifiers that look powerful on paper were measured into 8 ohms and will clip sooner into a real-world 4-ohm speaker. The specification sheet tells you watts, but often into an idealized load that the speaker never presents.
Headroom matters more than average level. Music is not a steady tone — a typical dynamic passage may ask the amplifier for ten or twenty times the power needed for the average listening level. That's why an amplifier running comfortably at modest levels will still clip on transient peaks if the speaker is insensitive and the room is large. Clipping sounds harsh and, sustained, it can damage tweeters. The practical argument for a moderate buffer of headroom above what you usually use is acoustic, not aspirational.
The practical argument for a moderate buffer of headroom above what you usually use is acoustic, not aspirational.
The actual answer
Calculate before you buy. Take your speaker's sensitivity, estimate how loud you listen at your seating distance, factor the room, and the required power falls out. You almost certainly need less than you fear in a small treated room with a sensitive speaker, and possibly more than you expect in a reverberant open space with an undemanding-looking 6-ohm load.
More watts beyond what the room and speaker require buys you nothing audible — just transformer weight and a higher electricity bill at idle. The well-matched modest amplifier will always outperform the mismatched powerful one.
Nothing on this site is scored or ranked. Where a real maker or component is named, it is named because naming it explains something.